struct ara::core::variant_alternative< I, const T >
template <std::size_t I, typename T> struct variant_alternative< I, const T > {...};
As per corresponding usage in [variant]
| Header-Datei | #include "ara/core/variant.h" |
|---|---|
| Forwarding-Header | #include "ara/core/core_fwd.h" |
| Scope | namespace ara::core |
User GuideAI-GENERATED
Determines the type of the indexed alternative of a constant variant sum type at compile time.
Determines the type of the indexed alternative of a constant variant sum type at compile time.
ara::core::variant_alternative<I, const T> serves as a template metaprogramming utility in module core to determine the type of the I-th alternative of a sum type with additional const qualification at compile time. Upon instantiation, the compiler statically evaluates the index I with respect to type const T and provides the resulting, read-only alternative type for generic functions. Since the structure operates purely at the compile-time level, neither runtime objects nor runtime errors exist; interpretation: an invalid index I is likely to lead directly to an abort of the compilation process. Question (open)
Context
The template specialization ara::core::variant_alternative<I, const T> belongs to module core of the AUTOSAR Adaptive Platform. It acts as a utility construct for template metaprogramming and serves to determine the type of a specific alternative at index position I for a const-qualified type const T. In this context, the specification description references the corresponding usage in the context of [variant]. Interpretation: In light of this reference to the variant concept, the class is likely to reproduce the semantics of std::variant_alternative from the C++ standard and serve as a link for accessing ara::core::variant. Question Q-94ac01e93461aed6 (open) The class template ensures that generic algorithms and utility functions operating on const references to variants can deduce the correct const type of the respective alternative at compile time. This avoids having to manually reconstruct const qualifiers during generic type queries or having to add them via helper traits.
Lifecycle
No conventional runtime lifecycle exists for ara::core::variant_alternative<I, const T> during application execution. Interpretation: Since the declaration describes a pure template structure, instantiation and evaluation are likely to take place exclusively during the compilation process by the C++ compiler. Question Q-2d665335d7c514da (open) Neither dynamic memory resources are requested nor are objects created or destroyed on the stack or heap. Ownership semantics, initialization phases, or explicit state transitions do not exist. With regard to concurrency, the construct is unrestricted safe: Since all type resolutions are completed statically prior to program execution and no mutable or shared states exist in memory, any number of threads can concurrently use methods or data types based on this trait without requiring synchronization mechanisms.
Usage Path
The primary field of application for this trait lies in the implementation of generic interfaces, type checks, and dispatch mechanisms for variant-based data structures. A typical usage path begins with a user or higher-level framework passing a type const T along with a constant integer index I as template arguments to ara::core::variant_alternative. The compiler resolves this partial specialization and transforms the base type of the alternative at position I into the corresponding const-qualified type. This resulting type is subsequently used as a return type for inspection functions, as a parameter type for read accesses, or for the static verification of type assumptions. Because the entire sequence is handled completely during the compilation process, neither additional computation steps nor function calls or memory accesses arise at program runtime.
Error Scenarios
Due to the static nature of this metaprogramming construct, neither failure scenarios nor error codes such as ara::core::ErrorCode or C++ exceptions exist at runtime. Error causes are purely syntactic or semantic in nature and lead to errors during compilation. Interpretation: If the index I is out of the valid range—that is, equal to or greater than the total number of alternatives defined in the variant—or if T is not an allowed variant type, the compiler is likely to abort compilation. Question (open) A precondition for successful use is therefore that the index I lies within the boundaries of the type buffer and that T is a complete, type-compatible sum type.
This guide is based on the specifications of AUTOSAR Adaptive Platform Release R25-11 for the core module.
gemini-3.8-flash-low· 2026-10-13 · German original